↓ Skip to main content

Class A GPCRs: Structure, Function, Modeling and Structure-based Ligand Design.

Overview of attention for article published in Current Pharmaceutical Design, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Class A GPCRs: Structure, Function, Modeling and Structure-based Ligand Design.
Published in
Current Pharmaceutical Design, November 2017
DOI 10.2174/1381612823666170710151255
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), especially the class A, are the most heavily investigated drug targets in the pharmaceutical industry. Tremendous efforts have been made by both industry and academia to understand the molecular structure and function of this large family of transmembrane proteins. Our understanding in GPCR activation has evolved from the classical inactive-active two-state model to a complex view of GPCR conformational ensemble associated with multiple interacting partners such as ligands, allosteric modulators, ions and downstream signaling proteins. New drug targets and ligand design strategies are unveiled. Meanwhile, breakthroughs in X-ray crystallography have resulted in high-resolution structures of over 30 GPCRs, providing structural basis for drug design and functional studies. These enabled wide applications of computational approaches in GPCR research have led to several groundbreaking studies in the last few years. While a large fraction of human GPCRs has yet to be crystallized, homology modeling plays a pivotal role in the simulation of these GPCRs. Here, we review the recent updates on class A GPCR structure and function, with a focus on the applications and perspectives of molecular modeling in GPCR ligand design.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 39 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 10 26%
Student > Master 4 10%
Researcher 4 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 8%
Professor 2 5%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 15 38%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 28%
Chemistry 4 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 5%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 15 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 July 2017.
All research outputs
#28,611,663
of 34,372,222 outputs
Outputs from Current Pharmaceutical Design
#3,641
of 4,562 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#279,169
of 347,256 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Pharmaceutical Design
#10
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,372,222 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,562 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 347,256 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.