↓ Skip to main content

Longitudinal Postoperative Course of Pain and Dysfunction Following Total Knee Arthroplasty

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical journal of pain, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
73 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Longitudinal Postoperative Course of Pain and Dysfunction Following Total Knee Arthroplasty
Published in
Clinical journal of pain, April 2018
DOI 10.1097/ajp.0000000000000540
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

While the majority of patients undergoing Total Knee Arthroplasty report substantial improvement in pain and function, a significant subset experience persistent post-surgical pain and dysfunction. Better understanding of the longitudinal postoperative course is needed, including the association between patient status following physical rehabilitation at 6 weeks post-TKA, to six month outcomes. This study aims to described the postoperative course of TKA and examine variables associated with change in pain and functioning between 6 weeks and 6 months post-TKA. In this longitudinal study of 223 participants, assessments of analgesic intake, depression, anxiety, pain catastrophizing, dysfunction, resting and range of motion (ROM) pain, and pain sensitivity were completed at 6 weeks post-TKA. Analgesic intake, pain ratings and dysfunction data were also collected at 6 months post-TKA. Pain and dysfunction ratings were divided into none-mild and moderate-severe categories. Between 6 weeks and 6 months post-TKA, 75% of the sample stayed in the same pain category, 20% improved, and 5% worsened. In terms of functional changes between 6 weeks and 6 months, 65% of the sample stayed in the same functional category, while 31% improved, and 5% worsened. These findings demonstrate that the majority of patients' pain and functioning remains stable between 6 weeks and 6 months post-TKA. However, a notable subset continues to improve or worsen in pain and functioning and the current study identifies variables associated with these changes.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 73 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 10%
Other 6 8%
Student > Bachelor 6 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 8%
Student > Master 5 7%
Other 11 15%
Unknown 32 44%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 14%
Psychology 6 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 5%
Sports and Recreations 2 3%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 36 49%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 July 2017.
All research outputs
#27,877,056
of 34,526,284 outputs
Outputs from Clinical journal of pain
#1,907
of 2,307 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#288,760
of 373,009 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical journal of pain
#24
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,526,284 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,307 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 373,009 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.