↓ Skip to main content

CMAJ

Optimal duration of antibiotic therapy for uncomplicated urinary tract infection in older women: a double-blind randomized controlled trial.

Overview of attention for article published in Canadian Medical Association Journal, February 2004
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
94 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Optimal duration of antibiotic therapy for uncomplicated urinary tract infection in older women: a double-blind randomized controlled trial.
Published in
Canadian Medical Association Journal, February 2004
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thomas Vogel, René Verreault, Marie Gourdeau, Michèle Morin, Lise Grenier-Gosselin, Louis Rochette

Abstract

The optimal duration of antibiotic therapy in older patients with uncomplicated urinary tract infection (UTI) is still a matter of debate. The aim of this randomized controlled double-blind noninferiority trial was to compare the efficacy and safety of 3-day and 7-day courses of oral ciprofloxacin for uncomplicated symptomatic UTI in older women.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 2%
Ireland 1 1%
Norway 1 1%
Denmark 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 88 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 19%
Other 15 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 11%
Student > Postgraduate 9 10%
Researcher 8 9%
Other 17 18%
Unknown 17 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 43 46%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 3%
Other 6 6%
Unknown 25 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 February 2024.
All research outputs
#2,864,636
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#3,027
of 9,453 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,315
of 62,591 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#11
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,453 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 62,591 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.