| Title |
Alibis for Adult Play
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Games and Culture, July 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1177/1555412017721086 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors | |
| Abstract |
The social meanings of play sit at odds with norms of responsible and productive adult conduct. To be "caught" playing as an adult therefore risks embarrassment. Still, many designers want to create enjoyable, nonembarrassing play experiences for adults. To address this need, this article reads instances of spontaneous adult play through the lens of Erving Goffman's theory of the interaction order to unpack conditions and strategies for nonembarrassing adult play. It identifies established frames, segregated audiences, scripts supporting smooth performance, managing audience awareness, role distancing, and, particularly, alibis for play: Adults routinely provide alternative, adult-appropriate motives to account for their play, such as child care, professional duties, creative expression, or health. Once legitimized, the norms and rules of play themselves then provide an alibi for behavior that would risk being embarrassing outside play. |
Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 16% |
| United States | 3 | 16% |
| Denmark | 1 | 5% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 5% |
| Germany | 1 | 5% |
| Australia | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 9 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 16 | 84% |
| Scientists | 2 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 107 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 17 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 15% |
| Lecturer | 10 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 21 | 20% |
| Unknown | 28 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 21 | 20% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 11 | 10% |
| Psychology | 9 | 8% |
| Computer Science | 8 | 7% |
| Arts and Humanities | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 20 | 19% |
| Unknown | 30 | 28% |