↓ Skip to main content

Head and neck cancers, version 2.2013. Featured updates to the NCCN guidelines.

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (JNCCN), August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
1 patent

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Head and neck cancers, version 2.2013. Featured updates to the NCCN guidelines.
Published in
Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (JNCCN), August 2013
DOI 10.6004/jnccn.2013.0113
Pubmed ID
Authors

David G Pfister, Kie-Kian Ang, David M Brizel, Barbara A Burtness, Paul M Busse, Jimmy J Caudell, Anthony J Cmelak, A Dimitrios Colevas, Frank Dunphy, David W Eisele, Jill Gilbert, Maura L Gillison, Robert I Haddad, Bruce H Haughey, Wesley L Hicks, Ying J Hitchcock, Merrill S Kies, William M Lydiatt, Ellie Maghami, Renato Martins, Thomas McCaffrey, Bharat B Mittal, Harlan A Pinto, John A Ridge, Sandeep Samant, David E Schuller, Jatin P Shah, Sharon Spencer, Randal S Weber, Gregory T Wolf, Frank Worden, Sue S Yom, Nicole R McMillian, Miranda Hughes

Abstract

These NCCN Guidelines Insights focus on nutrition and supportive care for patients with head and neck cancers. This topic was a recent addition to the NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) for Head and Neck Cancers. The NCCN Guidelines Insights focus on major updates to the NCCN Guidelines and discuss the new updates in greater detail. The complete version of the NCCN Guidelines for Head and Neck Cancers is available on the NCCN Web site (NCCN.org).

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 19%
Student > Postgraduate 4 19%
Other 3 14%
Professor 3 14%
Student > Bachelor 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 5 24%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 57%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 5%
Engineering 1 5%
Unknown 6 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 October 2024.
All research outputs
#11,256,982
of 34,451,315 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (JNCCN)
#1,160
of 2,277 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81,044
of 240,593 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (JNCCN)
#9
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,451,315 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,277 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.3. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,593 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.