↓ Skip to main content

A Posture Recognition-Based Fall Detection System for Monitoring an Elderly Person in a Smart Home Environment

Overview of attention for article published in IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

patent
36 patents

Readers on

mendeley
251 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
A Posture Recognition-Based Fall Detection System for Monitoring an Elderly Person in a Smart Home Environment
Published in
IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine, August 2012
DOI 10.1109/titb.2012.2214786
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

We propose a novel computer vision based fall detection system for monitoring an elderly person in a home care application. Background subtraction is applied to extract the foreground human body and the result is improved by using certain post-processing. Information from ellipse fitting and a projection histogram along the axes of the ellipse are used as the features for distinguishing different postures of the human. These features are then fed into a directed acyclic graph support vector machine (DAGSVM) for posture classification, the result of which is then combined with derived floor information to detect a fall. From a dataset of 15 people, we show that our fall detection system can achieve a high fall detection rate (97.08%) and a very low false detection rate (0.8%) in a simulated home environment.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 251 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Turkey 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 246 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 52 21%
Student > Master 48 19%
Student > Bachelor 28 11%
Researcher 16 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 5%
Other 26 10%
Unknown 69 27%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 70 28%
Engineering 66 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 2%
Social Sciences 5 2%
Other 24 10%
Unknown 71 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 May 2026.
All research outputs
#6,533,249
of 30,096,795 outputs
Outputs from IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine
#92
of 525 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,699
of 197,751 outputs
Outputs of similar age from IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine
#4
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 30,096,795 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 525 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,751 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.