↓ Skip to main content

Self-efficacy and self-rated oral health among pregnant aboriginal Australian women

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Oral Health, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
108 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Self-efficacy and self-rated oral health among pregnant aboriginal Australian women
Published in
BMC Oral Health, April 2014
DOI 10.1186/1472-6831-14-29
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Self-efficacy plays an important role in oral health-related behaviours. There is little known about associations between self-efficacy and subjective oral health among populations at heightened risk of dental disease. This study aimed to determine if low self-efficacy was associated with poor self-rated oral health after adjusting for confounding among a convenience sample of pregnant women.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 108 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Colombia 1 <1%
Unknown 107 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 14%
Researcher 9 8%
Student > Postgraduate 8 7%
Student > Bachelor 7 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 6%
Other 25 23%
Unknown 37 34%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 39 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 8%
Social Sciences 9 8%
Psychology 5 5%
Sports and Recreations 2 2%
Other 8 7%
Unknown 36 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 July 2015.
All research outputs
#24,436,933
of 29,701,924 outputs
Outputs from BMC Oral Health
#1,489
of 2,143 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#187,180
of 246,591 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Oral Health
#18
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 29,701,924 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,143 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 246,591 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.