You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effect of liver hydrolysate on ethanol- and acetaldehyde-induced deficiencies
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Folia Pharmacologica Japonica, January 1998
|
| DOI | 10.1254/fpj.111.117 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
M Washizuka, Y Hiraga, H Furuichi, J Izumi, K Yoshinaga, T Abe, Y Tanaka, H Tamaki |
| Abstract |
Since it has been reported that amino acids have alleviating effects on ethanol- and acetaldehyde-induced toxicity, we investigated the effect of liver hydrolysate derived from bovine liver on ethanol- or acetaldehyde-induced toxicity and deficiency models of mice and rats in the present study. Liver hydrolysate improved the deficiencies of beam walking and food intake of mice in a dose-dependent fashion when challenged with ethanol at the dose of 5 ml/kg, p.o. According to the analysis using selective inhibitors for alcohol dehydrogenase and acetaldehyde dehydrogenase, it has been suggested that this improvement effect of liver hydrolysate is mainly due to the reduction of acetaldehyde toxicity. No effect of liver hydrolysate was found in coma and death produced by orally treated ethanol at 10 ml/kg. In contrast, liver hydrolysate dose-dependently decreased the coma and death of mice administered acetaldehyde at 1.8 ml/kg, p.o. Furthermore, an increase in serum GPT activity, which was caused by twice oral administration of acetaldehyde at 1.2 ml/kg at interval of 1 hr, was inhibited by liver hydrolysate. These results suggest that liver hydrolysate has a protective effect against ethanol- and acetaldehyde-induced toxicity. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 6 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 3 | 50% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 17% |
| Researcher | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 1 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 50% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 1 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 May 2019.
All research outputs
#2,655,798
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Folia Pharmacologica Japonica
#9
of 785 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,647
of 94,808 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Folia Pharmacologica Japonica
#1
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 785 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,808 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.