↓ Skip to main content

Detection of high-level tetracycline resistance in clinical isolates of Helicobacter pylori using PCR-RFLP

Overview of attention for article published in FEMS Immunology & Medical Microbiology, January 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
patent
2 patents

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Detection of high-level tetracycline resistance in clinical isolates of Helicobacter pylori using PCR-RFLP
Published in
FEMS Immunology & Medical Microbiology, January 2006
DOI 10.1016/s0928-8244(03)00277-3
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Tetracycline is one of four antibiotics commonly used for the treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection, but its effectiveness is decreasing as the incidence of tetracycline resistance is increasing. In five Brazilian tetracycline-resistant (Tet(R)) H. pylori isolates, high-level tetracycline resistance is mediated by the triple-base-pair substitution AGA(926-928)-->TTC in both 16S rRNA genes, as was previously observed in two independent high-level Tet(R) H. pylori strains. A polymerase chain reaction-based restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) assay was developed for the detection of the AGA(926-928)-->TTC substitution, and confirmed the presence of the aforementioned triple-base-pair substitution in all five Brazilian Tet(R) isolates. This PCR-RFLP-based approach distinguishes the high-level Tet(R) isolates from low-level Tet(R) and Tet(S) H. pylori strains and thus allows the direct detection of Tet(R) H. pylori isolates.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 3%
Unknown 38 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 10%
Student > Master 4 10%
Other 2 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Other 8 21%
Unknown 13 33%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 13%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 8%
Environmental Science 1 3%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 12 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 September 2019.
All research outputs
#6,087,335
of 27,782,313 outputs
Outputs from FEMS Immunology & Medical Microbiology
#155
of 938 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,247
of 185,318 outputs
Outputs of similar age from FEMS Immunology & Medical Microbiology
#39
of 209 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,782,313 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 938 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 185,318 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 209 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.