↓ Skip to main content

Toward an Understanding of Decision Making in Severe Mental Illness

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
reddit
4 Redditors
podcasts
1 podcast

Readers on

mendeley
277 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Toward an Understanding of Decision Making in Severe Mental Illness
Published in
Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, January 2014
DOI 10.1176/appi.neuropsych.12110268
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

A commonality of patients with major psychiatric disorders is their propensity to make poor decisions, which is intimately related to poor real-life outcomes. We reviewed the literature on decision making as applied to severe psychiatric disorders, with particular focus on advances in cognitive neuroscience. Deficits in reward sensitivity, avoidance learning, and temporal discounting are reported in depression. Besides abnormalities in hedonic capacity, other cognitive distortions required for flexible control of behavior occur in patients with bipolar disorder and schizophrenia. A conceptual framework of abnormal decision making in mental illness could generate targeted interventions to improve quality of life and clinical outcomes.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 277 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 3 1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 271 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 43 16%
Student > Master 40 14%
Researcher 37 13%
Student > Bachelor 28 10%
Other 20 7%
Other 36 13%
Unknown 73 26%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 80 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 33 12%
Neuroscience 32 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 4%
Social Sciences 9 3%
Other 33 12%
Unknown 78 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 August 2023.
All research outputs
#3,778,881
of 34,365,356 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences
#261
of 1,700 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,920
of 373,079 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences
#7
of 78 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,365,356 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,700 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 373,079 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 78 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.