↓ Skip to main content

A REVIEW OF INDIVIDUAL PSYCHOTHERAPY OUTCOMES FOR ADULT SURVIVORS OF CHILDHOOD SEXUAL ABUSE

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Psychology Review, October 2001
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources

Readers on

mendeley
94 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
A REVIEW OF INDIVIDUAL PSYCHOTHERAPY OUTCOMES FOR ADULT SURVIVORS OF CHILDHOOD SEXUAL ABUSE
Published in
Clinical Psychology Review, October 2001
DOI 10.1016/s0272-7358(00)00086-6
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

This review examines the current literature on individual psychotherapy outcomes with adult survivors of childhood sexual abuse. As compared to the literature on treatment with victims of sexual trauma in adulthood, fewer researchers have explored the field of psychotherapy outcome with this population, particularly with regard to individual treatments. For this reason, a review of psychotherapy outcome for adult survivors of child sexual abuse is needed. This review first presents issues salient to the study of treatment with this population, such as prevalence, short-term impact, and long-term sequelae of childhood sexual trauma. Next, the eight studies that have been published on individual psychotherapy for this population are presented and evaluated according to both efficacy and effectiveness criteria for a methodologically sound study. Last, directions for future research with this population include continued integration of efficacy and effectiveness methodology, use of multi-method/multi-rater assessment data, as well as further investigation of interpersonal variables such as the therapeutic alliance.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Portugal 1 1%
Denmark 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Unknown 91 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 15%
Researcher 13 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 13%
Student > Bachelor 7 7%
Other 14 15%
Unknown 19 20%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 54 57%
Social Sciences 8 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 1%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 1%
Other 1 1%
Unknown 23 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 January 2013.
All research outputs
#6,118,474
of 27,932,147 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Psychology Review
#1,025
of 1,668 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,260
of 50,062 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Psychology Review
#4
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,932,147 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,668 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.2. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 50,062 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.