↓ Skip to main content

Relationship of clinical presentation to time to antibiotics for the emergency department management of suspected bacterial meningitis

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Emergency Medicine, November 1993
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Relationship of clinical presentation to time to antibiotics for the emergency department management of suspected bacterial meningitis
Published in
Annals of Emergency Medicine, November 1993
DOI 10.1016/s0196-0644(05)81314-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

David A Talan, Joseph Zibulewsky

Abstract

The acuity and specificity of the clinical presentation of bacterial meningitis are significantly associated with the time to antibiotic administration. Retrospective case series. Seven hundred-bed university and 1,000-bed community hospital. One hundred twenty-two children and adults primarily evaluated in the emergency department and admitted with the diagnosis of suspected bacterial meningitis. The ED chart was reviewed for demographic, historical, physical examination, and time data and sequence of interventions. In addition, we categorized patient presentations as "sick" or not and as "classic" or not based on the following predetermined definitions. A "sick" presentation was defined as at least two of the following: temperature of more than 40 C, lethargic or comatose mental status, hypotension, or tachycardia. A "classic" presentation was defined as temperature of more than 39 C and at least one of the following: nuchal rigidity, bulging fontanelle, or abnormal mental status. Association of clinical variables and management practices to time to antibiotics was analyzed by analysis of variance and regression. The geometric mean time from ED registration until antibiotic initiation was 2.7 hours (range, 0.5 to 18 hours). Clinical factors that were associated independently with less time to antibiotics (hours less, P value) were a history of vomiting (0.5 hour, P = .06), no history of headache (0.8 hour, P = .01), hypotension (1.0 hour, P = .02), a bulging fontanelle (0.9 hour, P = .01), and a "sick presentation" (0.5 hour, P = .06). Management scenarios in which antibiotics were not administered until after return of results of computed tomography head scan or laboratory cerebrospinal fluid analysis and the practice of initiation of antibiotics on the ward compared with in the ED were associated independently with even greater delays (1.7 to 1.8 hours, P < .0001). Certain clinical factors, particularly those associated with acute illness compared with those that suggest the specific diagnosis, are associated with less time to antibiotics. Management practices, such as the order of interventions and the site of initiation of antibiotic therapy, appear to be of much greater importance in predicting antibiotic timeliness and represent an area of potentially avoidable delay for the ED management of suspected bacterial meningitis.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 5%
Unknown 21 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 14%
Researcher 3 14%
Student > Postgraduate 3 14%
Student > Bachelor 2 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 9%
Other 4 18%
Unknown 5 23%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 41%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 June 2012.
All research outputs
#9,516,022
of 27,783,697 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Emergency Medicine
#4,420
of 7,695 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,282
of 22,668 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Emergency Medicine
#19
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,783,697 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,695 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.5. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 22,668 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.