↓ Skip to main content

Obstructive sleep apnea in idiopathic intracranial hypertension: comparison with matched population data

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neurology, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Obstructive sleep apnea in idiopathic intracranial hypertension: comparison with matched population data
Published in
Journal of Neurology, February 2013
DOI 10.1007/s00415-013-6858-6
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) frequently have coexisting obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). We aimed to determine if the prevalence and severity of OSA is greater in patients with IIH than would be expected, given their other risk factors for OSA. We included 24 patients (20 women, four men) with newly-diagnosed IIH who had undergone overnight polysomnography. We calculated the expected apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) for each patient, based on their age, sex, race, body mass index (BMI), and menopausal status, using a model derived from 1,741 randomly-sampled members of the general population who had undergone overnight polysomnography. We compared the AHI values obtained from polysomnography with those predicted by the model using a paired t test. Our study had 80 % power to detect a 10-unit change in mean AHI at α = 0.05. Eight patients (33.3 %; six women, two men) had OSA by polysomnography. AHIs from polysomnography were not significantly different from those predicted by the model (mean difference 3.5, 95 % CI: -3.0-9.9, p = 0.28). We conclude that the prevalence and severity of OSA in IIH patients is no greater than would be expected for their age, sex, race, BMI, and menopausal status. It remains unclear whether the presence or treatment of OSA influences the clinical course of IIH.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 4%
Unknown 52 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 6 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 11%
Researcher 5 9%
Student > Postgraduate 5 9%
Other 4 7%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 21 39%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 35%
Neuroscience 6 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Engineering 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 25 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 April 2021.
All research outputs
#18,118,140
of 26,505,350 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neurology
#3,842
of 5,220 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#211,410
of 315,166 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neurology
#22
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,505,350 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,220 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,166 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.