↓ Skip to main content

A comparison of instrumental dewatering methods for the separation and concentration of suspended sediment for subsequent trace element analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Hydrological Processes, July 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
49 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A comparison of instrumental dewatering methods for the separation and concentration of suspended sediment for subsequent trace element analysis
Published in
Hydrological Processes, July 2006
DOI 10.1002/hyp.3360030206
Authors

A. J. Horowitz, K. A. Elrick, R. C. Hooper

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 42%
Researcher 2 17%
Student > Master 2 17%
Professor 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 3 25%
Engineering 2 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 17%
Chemical Engineering 1 8%
Chemistry 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Unknown 2 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 June 2012.
All research outputs
#8,232,822
of 24,662,675 outputs
Outputs from Hydrological Processes
#743
of 2,048 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,054
of 71,275 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Hydrological Processes
#8
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,662,675 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,048 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 71,275 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.