↓ Skip to main content

COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF SUBSTANCE ABUSE SERVICES Implications for Public Policy

Overview of attention for article published in Psychiatric clinics of North America, June 1999
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
3 policy sources

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF SUBSTANCE ABUSE SERVICES Implications for Public Policy
Published in
Psychiatric clinics of North America, June 1999
DOI 10.1016/s0193-953x(05)70083-6
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Cost-effectiveness analysis, a technique for allocating resources, examines the relationship between the cost of providing treatment and resulting improvement in health measured in a single, numerical scale. In applying this concept to substance abuse services, the authors expressed effectiveness in terms of additional "abstinent years." To control for differences in clients across modalities, the authors used multivariate cost-effectiveness analysis, estimating results for a typical client at each of three alternative severity levels.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Spain 1 5%
Unknown 18 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 16%
Researcher 3 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 11%
Other 4 21%
Unknown 1 5%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 21%
Psychology 4 21%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 1 5%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 March 2021.
All research outputs
#5,140,676
of 34,361,833 outputs
Outputs from Psychiatric clinics of North America
#240
of 1,106 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,373
of 52,982 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychiatric clinics of North America
#3
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,361,833 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,106 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 52,982 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.