An approach to treatment plan optimization is presented that inputs dose--volume constraints and utilizes a feasibility search algorithm that seeks a set of beam weights so that the calculated dose distributions satisfy the dose--volume constraints. In contrast to a search for the "best" plan, this approach can quickly determine feasibility and point out the most restrictive of the predetermined constraints.
The cyclic subgradient projection (CSP) algorithm was modified to incorporate dose--volume constraints in a treatment plan optimization schema. The algorithm was applied to determine beam weights for several representative three-dimensional treatment plans.
Using the modified CSP algorithm, we found that either a feasible solution to the dose--volume constraint problem was found or the program determined, after a predetermined set of iterations was performed, that no feasible solution existed for the particular set of dose--volume constraints. If no feasible solution existed, we relaxed several of the dose--volume constraints and were able to achieve a feasible solution.
Feasibility search algorithms can be used in radiation treatment planning to generate a treatment plan that meets the dose--volume constraints established by the radiation oncologist. In the absence of a feasible solution, these algorithms can provide information to the radiation oncologist as to how the dose--volume constraints may be modified to achieve a feasible solution.
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 May 2008.
All research outputs
#12,344,996
of 34,363,559 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics
#6,496
of 15,462 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,486
of 63,358 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics
#27
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,363,559 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,462 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 63,358 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
