↓ Skip to main content

Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae Endocarditis: Microbiologic, Epidemiologic, and Clinical Features of an Occupational Disease

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Infectious Diseases, March 1988
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae Endocarditis: Microbiologic, Epidemiologic, and Clinical Features of an Occupational Disease
Published in
Clinical Infectious Diseases, March 1988
DOI 10.1093/clinids/10.2.317
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gary L. Gorby, James E. Peacock

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Uruguay 1 3%
Unknown 32 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 15%
Other 4 12%
Student > Bachelor 4 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 9%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 2 6%
Other 6 18%
Unknown 9 27%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 24%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 5 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 6%
Chemistry 2 6%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 10 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2001.
All research outputs
#8,870,392
of 26,316,852 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Infectious Diseases
#9,694
of 16,844 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,458
of 12,095 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Infectious Diseases
#3
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,316,852 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,844 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.5. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 12,095 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.