↓ Skip to main content

A pilot study of cognitive behavioral stress management effects on stress, quality of life, and symptoms in persons with chronic fatigue syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Psychosomatic Research, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
142 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
A pilot study of cognitive behavioral stress management effects on stress, quality of life, and symptoms in persons with chronic fatigue syndrome
Published in
Journal of Psychosomatic Research, January 2011
DOI 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2010.11.010
Pubmed ID
Authors

Corina Lopez, Michael Antoni, Frank Penedo, Donna Weiss, Stacy Cruess, Mary-Catherine Segotas, Lynn Helder, Scott Siegel, Nancy Klimas, Mary Ann Fletcher

Abstract

The present pilot study was designed to test the effects of a 12-week group-based cognitive behavioral stress management (CBSM) intervention on stress, quality of life, and symptoms in chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS). We hypothesized that participants randomized to CBSM would report improvements in perceived stress, mood, quality of life, and CFS symptomatology from pre- to postintervention compared to those receiving a psychoeducational (PE) seminar control.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 142 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 140 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 27 19%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 10%
Researcher 14 10%
Student > Bachelor 13 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 8%
Other 33 23%
Unknown 29 20%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 42 30%
Medicine and Dentistry 34 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 7%
Social Sciences 6 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 1%
Other 17 12%
Unknown 31 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 February 2024.
All research outputs
#17,656,410
of 27,458,340 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Psychosomatic Research
#2,200
of 3,367 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#171,994
of 215,395 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Psychosomatic Research
#20
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,458,340 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,367 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.0. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 215,395 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.