↓ Skip to main content

How Do Social Service Providers View Recent Immigrants? Perspectives from Portland, Maine, and Olympia, Washington

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
How Do Social Service Providers View Recent Immigrants? Perspectives from Portland, Maine, and Olympia, Washington
Published in
Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies, March 2014
DOI 10.1080/15562948.2013.823533
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

This article explores how social service providers in two small, geographically distinct cities-Portland, Maine, and Olympia, Washington-understand the importance of welcoming and incorporating new immigrants in their cities. We focus on how providers characterize their responsibilities, how they understand the importance of responding to new immigrants, and what they describe as the challenges and opportunities presented by recent immigration to their cities. Despite differences in Portland and Olympia, we find that providers in both cities combine a sense of moral responsibility to help immigrants, with an emphasis on the economic and cultural resources immigrants bring to cities. These insights expand recent immigration scholarship from a focus on immigrants alone to include the perspectives and logics of social service workers who are often their first points of contact in new places.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Canada 1 3%
Unknown 30 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 16%
Student > Bachelor 4 13%
Researcher 4 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 10%
Other 5 16%
Unknown 7 23%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 18 58%
Psychology 3 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Unknown 9 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 April 2014.
All research outputs
#21,531,190
of 34,400,738 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies
#272
of 377 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#157,239
of 265,426 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,400,738 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 377 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,426 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.