↓ Skip to main content

Genomic analysis establishes correlation between growth and laryngeal neuropathy in Thoroughbreds

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Genomics, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
91 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Genomic analysis establishes correlation between growth and laryngeal neuropathy in Thoroughbreds
Published in
BMC Genomics, April 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2164-15-259
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Equine recurrent laryngeal neuropathy (RLN) is a bilateral mononeuropathy with an unknown pathogenesis that significantly affects performance in Thoroughbreds. A genetic contribution to the pathogenesis of RLN is suggested by the higher prevalence of the condition in offspring of RLN-affected than unaffected stallions. To better understand RLN pathogenesis and its genetic basis, we performed a genome-wide association (GWAS) of 282 RLN-affected and 268 control Thoroughbreds.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Mexico 1 1%
France 1 1%
Unknown 87 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 13 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 13%
Student > Master 10 11%
Researcher 9 10%
Other 6 7%
Other 20 22%
Unknown 21 23%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 25%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 20 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 5%
Neuroscience 2 2%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 25 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2022.
All research outputs
#4,594,014
of 23,114,117 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#1,891
of 10,708 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,349
of 226,369 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#14
of 161 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,114,117 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,708 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,369 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 161 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.