↓ Skip to main content

Impact of respiratory movement on the computed tomographic images of small lung tumors in three-dimensional (3D) radiotherapy

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics, March 2000
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Readers on

mendeley
65 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Impact of respiratory movement on the computed tomographic images of small lung tumors in three-dimensional (3D) radiotherapy
Published in
International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics, March 2000
DOI 10.1016/s0360-3016(99)00352-1
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Three-dimensional (3D) treatment planning has often been performed while patients breathe freely, under the assumption that the computed tomography (CT) images represent the average position of the tumor. We investigated the impact of respiratory movement on the free-breathing CT images of small lung tumors using sequential CT scanning at the same table position. Using a preparatory free-breathing CT scan, the patient's couch was fixed at the position where each tumor showed its maximum diameter on image. For 16 tumors, over 20 sequential CT images were taken every 2 s, with a 1-s acquisition time occurring during free breathing. For each tumor, the distance between the surface of the CT table and the posterior border of the tumor was measured to determine whether the edge of the tumor was sufficiently included in the planning target volume (PTV) during normal breathing. In the sequential CT scanning, the tumor itself was not visible in the examination slice in 21% (75/357) of cases. There were statistically significant differences between lower lobe tumors (39.4%, 71/180) and upper lobe tumors (0%, 0/89) (p < 0.01) and between lower lobe tumors and middle lobe tumor (8.9%, 4/45) (p < 0.01) in the incidence of the disappearance of the tumor from the image. The mean difference between the maximum and minimum distances between the surface of the CT table and the posterior border of the tumor was 6.4 mm (range 2.1-24.4). Three-dimensional treatment planning for lung carcinoma would significantly underdose many lesions, especially those in the lower lobe. The excess "safety margin" might call into question any additional benefit of 3D treatment. More work is required to determine how to control respiratory movement.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Germany 2 3%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 62 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 22%
Researcher 14 22%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 9%
Other 3 5%
Other 8 12%
Unknown 13 20%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 20 31%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 20%
Engineering 7 11%
Computer Science 5 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 14 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 February 2014.
All research outputs
#12,359,716
of 34,410,798 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics
#6,496
of 15,466 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,354
of 60,758 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics
#31
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,410,798 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,466 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 60,758 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.