↓ Skip to main content

Smartphone Surgery: How Technology Can Transform Practice

Overview of attention for article published in Telemedicine Journal and e-Health, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
91 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Smartphone Surgery: How Technology Can Transform Practice
Published in
Telemedicine Journal and e-Health, April 2014
DOI 10.1089/tmj.2013.0234
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Abstract Rural trauma care has been regarded as being the "challenge for the next decade." Trauma patients in rural areas face more struggles than their urban counterparts because of the absence of specialized trauma care, delay in providing immediate care to trauma victims, and longer transport times to reach a trauma center. Telemedicine is a promising tool for facilitating rural trauma care. This stellar tool creates a real-time link between a remotely located specialist and the local healthcare provider, especially during the initial management of the trauma patient, involving resuscitation and even intubation. However, the high cost of purchasing, setting up, and maintaining all the needed equipment has made telemedicine an expensive proposition for rural hospitals, which frequently have limited budgets. But recently, new improvements in communication technology have made smartphones an indispensable part of daily life, even in rural areas. These devices have great potential to improve patient care and enhance medical education because of their wide adoption and ease of use. In this article, we describe our initial teletrauma experience and the effect of smartphone implementation in patient care and medical education at the University of Arizona Medical Center in Tucson.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Singapore 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
Unknown 86 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 20%
Researcher 15 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 10%
Student > Bachelor 7 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 5%
Other 13 14%
Unknown 24 26%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 9%
Psychology 8 9%
Computer Science 4 4%
Social Sciences 4 4%
Other 15 16%
Unknown 30 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 April 2014.
All research outputs
#31,183,241
of 34,361,833 outputs
Outputs from Telemedicine Journal and e-Health
#2,002
of 2,228 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#240,527
of 269,456 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Telemedicine Journal and e-Health
#41
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,361,833 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,228 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,456 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.