↓ Skip to main content

A Description of Intraoperative Ventilator Management and Ventilation Strategies in Hypoxic Patients

Overview of attention for article published in Anesthesia and analgesia, April 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
72 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
A Description of Intraoperative Ventilator Management and Ventilation Strategies in Hypoxic Patients
Published in
Anesthesia and analgesia, April 2010
DOI 10.1213/ane.0b013e3181da82e1
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Hypoxia is a common finding in the anesthetized patient. Although there are a variety of methods to address hypoxia, it is not well documented what strategies are used by anesthesiologists when faced with a hypoxic patient. Studies have identified that lung protective ventilation strategies have beneficial effects in both oxygenation and mortality in acute respiratory distress syndrome. We sought to describe the ventilation strategies in anesthetized patients with varying degrees of hypoxemia as defined by the Pao(2) to fraction of inspired oxygen (Fio(2)) (P/F) ratio.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
France 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 69 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 15%
Student > Postgraduate 11 15%
Other 10 14%
Researcher 7 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 10%
Other 15 21%
Unknown 11 15%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 51 71%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 1%
Computer Science 1 1%
Other 1 1%
Unknown 11 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2014.
All research outputs
#28,747,540
of 34,518,147 outputs
Outputs from Anesthesia and analgesia
#9,851
of 11,028 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#136,162
of 147,691 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Anesthesia and analgesia
#75
of 81 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,518,147 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,028 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 147,691 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 81 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.