↓ Skip to main content

Children's Attributions of Intentions to an Invisible Agent

Overview of attention for article published in Developmental Psychology, March 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
reddit
2 Redditors
video
1 YouTube creator

Readers on

mendeley
108 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Children's Attributions of Intentions to an Invisible Agent
Published in
Developmental Psychology, March 2006
DOI 10.1037/0012-1649.42.2.253
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jesse M. Bering, Becky D. Parker

Abstract

Children ages 3-9 years were informed that an invisible agent (Princess Alice) would help them play a forced-choice game by "telling them, somehow, when they chose the wrong box," whereas a matched control group of children were not given this supernatural prime. On 2 unexpected event trials, an experimenter triggered a simulated unexpected event (i.e., a light turning on/off; a picture falling), and children's behavioral response to these events (i.e., moving their hand to the opposite box) was coded. Results showed a significant Age GroupxExperimental Condition interaction; the only children to reliably alter their behavior in response to the unexpected events were the oldest children (M=7 years 4 months), who were primed with the invisible agent concept. For children's posttest verbal explanations, also, only these children saw the unexpected events as being referential and declarative (e.g., "Princess Alice did it because I chose the wrong box"). Together, these data suggest that children may not regularly begin to see communicative signs as embedded in unexpected events until they are around 7 years of age.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 108 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 7 6%
United Kingdom 6 6%
Israel 1 <1%
Croatia 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Unknown 91 84%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 34%
Student > Bachelor 13 12%
Researcher 13 12%
Student > Master 6 6%
Other 5 5%
Other 25 23%
Unknown 9 8%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 61 56%
Social Sciences 10 9%
Arts and Humanities 7 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 5%
Philosophy 4 4%
Other 9 8%
Unknown 12 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2023.
All research outputs
#20,674,491
of 32,893,668 outputs
Outputs from Developmental Psychology
#2,534
of 4,816 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,135
of 123,837 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Developmental Psychology
#6
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,893,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,816 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.2. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 123,837 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.