You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Association of the MMP-3 5A/6A gene polymorphism with multiple sclerosis in patients from Serbia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of the Neurological Sciences, October 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jns.2007.09.037 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tamara Djurić, Maja Živković, Aleksandra Stanković, Evica Dinčić, Ranko Raičević, Dragan Alavantić |
| Abstract |
Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) are proteolytic enzymes involved in remodeling of the extracellular matrix. MMPs are suggested to play a role in the influx of inflammatory cells into the CNS, disruption of the blood brain barrier, and to degrade myelin in vitro. In this study, we have investigated the possible association of MMP-3 5A/6A gene polymorphism with MS susceptibility and/or severity in patients from Serbia. A total of 184 MS patients (150 RR, 34 SP) and 236 controls have been studied. Results show that the distribution of MMP-3 5A/6A genotype frequencies between MS patients and controls were not significantly different. In bout onset patients, carriers of MMP-3 6A/6A genotype had significantly higher mean MSSS values compared to the carriers of 5A allele (6.29+/-1.89 vs. 5.29+/-2.62, respectively, ANCOVA, p=0.01 Scheffe post-hoc test). In conclusion, our results indicate association of MMP-3 6A/6A genotype with significantly higher mean MSSS values. Thus, the obtained results suggest that it should be carefully considered during follow up of patients with MS. Further genetic and functional studies are needed to resolve the complex role of MMPs and their tissue inhibitors in MS pathology and/or regeneration. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 20 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Professor | 4 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 20% |
| Researcher | 3 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 10% |
| Other | 3 | 15% |
| Unknown | 2 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 25% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 20% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 15% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 10% |
| Materials Science | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 5 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 September 2014.
All research outputs
#5,446,210
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the Neurological Sciences
#1,098
of 5,250 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,083
of 88,284 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the Neurological Sciences
#4
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,250 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 88,284 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.