↓ Skip to main content

Evidence Against the “Y–T Coupling” Mechanism of Activation in the Response Regulator NtrC

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Molecular Biology, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Evidence Against the “Y–T Coupling” Mechanism of Activation in the Response Regulator NtrC
Published in
Journal of Molecular Biology, January 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.jmb.2013.12.027
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The dominant theory on the mechanism of response regulators activation in two-component bacterial signaling systems is the "Y-T coupling" mechanism, wherein the χ1 rotameric state of a highly conserved aromatic residue correlates with the activation of the protein via structural rearrangements coupled to a conserved tyrosine. In this paper, we present evidence that, in the receiver domain of the response regulator nitrogen regulatory protein C (NtrC(R)), the interconversion of this tyrosine (Y101) between its rotameric states is actually faster than the rate of inactive/active conversion and is not correlated to the activation process. Data gathered from NMR relaxation dispersion experiments show that a subset of residues surrounding the conserved tyrosine sense a process that is occurring at a faster rate than the inactive/active conformational transition. We show that this process is related to χ1 rotamer exchange of Y101 and that mutation of this aromatic residue to a leucine eliminated this second faster process without affecting activation. Computational simulations of NtrC(R) in its active conformation further demonstrate that the rotameric state of Y101 is uncorrelated with the global conformational transition during activation. Moreover, the tyrosine does not appear to be involved in the stabilization of the active form upon phosphorylation and is not essential in propagating the signal downstream for ATPase activity of the central domain. Our data provide experimental evidence against the generally accepted "Y-T coupling" mechanism of activation in NtrC(R).

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 37 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 27%
Researcher 9 24%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 11%
Other 2 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Other 6 16%
Unknown 4 11%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 38%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 30%
Chemistry 3 8%
Chemical Engineering 1 3%
Computer Science 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 6 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 January 2014.
All research outputs
#20,657,128
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Molecular Biology
#11,202
of 11,921 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#242,342
of 318,514 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Molecular Biology
#29
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,921 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 318,514 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.