↓ Skip to main content

Implementation challenges in the intensive care unit: The why, who, and how of daily interruption of sedation

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Critical Care, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Readers on

mendeley
102 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Implementation challenges in the intensive care unit: The why, who, and how of daily interruption of sedation
Published in
Journal of Critical Care, January 2012
DOI 10.1016/j.jcrc.2011.11.007
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Despite strong medical evidence and policy initiatives supporting the use of daily interruption of sedation in mechanically ventilated patients, compliance remains suboptimal. We sought to identify new barriers to daily interruption of sedation.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 98 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 19%
Other 9 9%
Researcher 9 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 8%
Student > Bachelor 6 6%
Other 25 25%
Unknown 26 25%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 38 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 25 25%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 2%
Other 6 6%
Unknown 26 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 September 2019.
All research outputs
#16,401,116
of 27,884,781 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Critical Care
#1,622
of 2,666 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#166,544
of 257,518 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Critical Care
#17
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,884,781 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,666 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 257,518 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.