↓ Skip to main content

Identifying disease-specific distress in patients with inflammatory bowel disease

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of Nursing (BJN), June 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
74 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Identifying disease-specific distress in patients with inflammatory bowel disease
Published in
British Journal of Nursing (BJN), June 2016
DOI 10.12968/bjon.2016.25.12.649
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) imposes a significant burden on patients. The authors have noticed an underlying presence of distress, seemingly distinct from anxiety and depression, in qualitative data collected for previous studies. Disease-related distress has been explored in diabetes, but has not been addressed in IBD. The authors aimed to determine the presence of IBD distress to inform development of a scale for assessing the phenomenon. This three-phase study used (1) a conceptual framework based on diabetes distress to conduct secondary analysis of qualitative data from four previous IBD studies (n=49 transcripts). Patient advisors confirmed the themes identified as causing distress, which guided (2) a focus group with people with IBD (n=8) and (3) items generated from phase 1 and 2 were subsequently used for a modified Delphi survey of IBD health professionals. Five IBD-distress themes were identified: emotional distress; healthcare-related distress; interpersonal/social distress; treatment-related distress; and symptom-related distress. Disease-specific distress in IBD was identified and is distinct from stress, anxiety and depression. Some causes of IBD distress overlap with diabetes distress, but existing diabetes-distress scales do not explain all the distress experienced by people with IBD and development of a new IBD-distress scale is warranted.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
France 1 1%
Unknown 73 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 10 14%
Student > Master 9 12%
Researcher 7 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 8%
Student > Postgraduate 5 7%
Other 13 18%
Unknown 24 32%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 13 18%
Psychology 9 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 12%
Neuroscience 3 4%
Unspecified 2 3%
Other 9 12%
Unknown 29 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 January 2018.
All research outputs
#24,757,289
of 34,365,356 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Nursing (BJN)
#1,352
of 2,079 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#231,897
of 344,079 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Nursing (BJN)
#20
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,365,356 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,079 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,079 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.