↓ Skip to main content

Polymicrobial Sepsis Alters Antigen-Dependent and -Independent Memory CD8 T Cell Functions

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of Immunology, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Polymicrobial Sepsis Alters Antigen-Dependent and -Independent Memory CD8 T Cell Functions
Published in
The Journal of Immunology, April 2014
DOI 10.4049/jimmunol.1303460
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Mortality from sepsis frequently results from secondary infections, and the extent to which sepsis affects pathogen-specific memory CD8 T cell responses remains unknown. Using the cecal ligation and puncture model of polymicrobial sepsis, we observed rapid apoptosis of pre-existing memory CD8 T cells after sepsis induction that led to a loss in CD8 T cell-mediated protection. Ag sensitivity (functional avidity) and Ag-driven secondary expansion of memory CD8 T cells were decreased after sepsis, further contributing to the observed loss in CD8 T cell-mediated immunity. Moreover, Ag-independent bystander activation of memory CD8 T cells in response to heterologous infection was also significantly impaired early after sepsis induction. The reduced sensitivity of pre-existing memory CD8 T cells to sense inflammation and respond to heterologous infection by IFN-γ production was observed in inbred and outbred hosts and controlled by extrinsic (but not cell-intrinsic) factors, suggesting that sepsis-induced changes in the environment regulate innate functions of memory CD8 T cells. Taken together, the data in this study revealed a previously unappreciated role of sepsis in shaping the quantity and functionality of infection- or vaccine-induced memory CD8 T cells and will help further define the decline in T cell-mediated immunity during the sepsis-induced phase of immunosuppression.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Turkey 1 2%
Unknown 44 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 13%
Researcher 6 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 9%
Other 3 7%
Other 9 20%
Unknown 8 18%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 22%
Immunology and Microbiology 9 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 20%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 9 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 April 2014.
All research outputs
#18,405,972
of 22,799,071 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Immunology
#17,921
of 19,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#164,261
of 226,746 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Immunology
#198
of 234 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,799,071 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 19,714 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,746 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 234 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.