↓ Skip to main content

Pay Now Or Pay Later: Providing Interpreter Services In Health Care

Overview of attention for article published in Health Affairs, March 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
4 policy sources
twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
169 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Pay Now Or Pay Later: Providing Interpreter Services In Health Care
Published in
Health Affairs, March 2005
DOI 10.1377/hlthaff.24.2.435
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Research amply documents that language barriers impede access to health care, compromise quality of care, and increase the risk of adverse health outcomes among patients with limited English proficiency. Federal civil rights policy obligates health care providers to supply language services, but wide gaps persist because insurers typically do not pay for interpreters, among other reasons. Health care financing policies should reinforce existing medical research and legal policies: Payers, including Medicaid, Medicare, and private insurers, should develop mechanisms to pay for interpretation services for patients who speak limited English.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 169 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 6 4%
Italy 1 <1%
Hong Kong 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Unknown 159 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 33 20%
Student > Master 24 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 14%
Other 14 8%
Student > Bachelor 13 8%
Other 37 22%
Unknown 25 15%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 44 26%
Social Sciences 32 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 10%
Linguistics 12 7%
Psychology 7 4%
Other 26 15%
Unknown 31 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 September 2026.
All research outputs
#1,753,138
of 33,779,198 outputs
Outputs from Health Affairs
#2,700
of 7,108 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,675
of 104,185 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Affairs
#9
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,779,198 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,108 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 69.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 104,185 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.