To determine the incidence of monochorionic twinning in pregnancies resulting from assisted reproduction technologies (ARTs).
We reviewed our experience with 218 ART pregnancies achieved over 3 years. All patients underwent transvaginal ultrasound 26 and 36 days after oocyte retrieval. The presence of two yolk sacs or two fetal poles within one sac suggested monochorionicity, and was confirmed by follow-up ultrasound and placental pathology. The various ARTs were compared to determine if any method had an increased incidence of monochorionicity compared to any other method. Statistical analysis was performed employing Chi Square analysis.
The incidence of monochorionicity in all gestations was 3.2% (8 times background rate); among multiple gestations it was 9.8%. The rates of monochorionicity for each ART appeared similar.
The incidence of monochorionic twinning is increased in pregnancies resulting from ART. Careful ultrasound evaluation of such pregnancies for monochorionicity is strongly recommended, both for planning of prenatal care and when considering a multifetal pregnancy reduction procedure.
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 June 2012.
All research outputs
#12,358,651
of 34,410,315 outputs
Outputs from Fertility & Sterility
#5,829
of 12,466 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,348
of 28,871 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Fertility & Sterility
#13
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,410,315 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,466 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.8. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 28,871 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
