↓ Skip to main content

Nutritional Development and the Target Weight Debate

Overview of attention for article published in Veterinary Clinics of North America: Food Animal Practice, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
69 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Nutritional Development and the Target Weight Debate
Published in
Veterinary Clinics of North America: Food Animal Practice, September 2013
DOI 10.1016/j.cvfa.2013.07.015
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Postnatal nutrition has immediate and long-lasting effects on beef heifer reproductive efficiency, longevity, and productivity. This article reviews the effects of nutrients and nutritional management on reproduction in developing heifers. In addition, the current debate on the preferred target weight for heifers at breeding is discussed.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Argentina 1 1%
Unknown 67 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 11 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 16%
Researcher 9 13%
Student > Postgraduate 8 12%
Student > Master 7 10%
Other 15 22%
Unknown 8 12%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26 38%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 18 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 8 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 April 2014.
All research outputs
#31,227,209
of 34,410,315 outputs
Outputs from Veterinary Clinics of North America: Food Animal Practice
#368
of 411 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#218,416
of 242,023 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Veterinary Clinics of North America: Food Animal Practice
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,410,315 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 411 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,023 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them