↓ Skip to main content

Systematic Isolation of Genes Differentially Expressed in Normal and Cancerous Tissue of the Pancreas

Overview of attention for article published in Pancreatology, January 2003
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

patent
4 patents

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Systematic Isolation of Genes Differentially Expressed in Normal and Cancerous Tissue of the Pancreas
Published in
Pancreatology, January 2003
DOI 10.1159/000070087
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

There is increasing knowledge about the genetic basis of pancreatic cancer (PaCa). Tumor suppressor genes (TSGs; e.g. p53 and DPC4) and oncogenes (e.g. K-ras) have been shown to be involved in the development of PaCa. However, the extent of chromosomal changes (gains and losses) implicates that many more genes may be involved in the multistep progression of PaCa. Identification of these genes is essential for understanding the molecular events in the development of PaCa. We assembled public and proprietary libraries of more than 4 million expressed sequence tags using newly developed software tools. We identified a total of 249 genes with specific expression patterns in normal and cancerous tissue of the pancreas. Of these, 27 genes were found to be preferentially expressed in normal tissue of the pancreas, while 222 genes showed significant upregulation of expression in PaCa. Of the 249 genes, 232 (93.2%) were found to represent known human genes or putative human homologues of genes characterized previously in other species, while 17 (6.8%) represent putative new genes. These genes may represent a valuable source to identify novel TSGs and oncogenes involved in the carcinogenesis of PaCa.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Germany 1 7%
Unknown 13 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 21%
Researcher 3 21%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 14%
Lecturer 1 7%
Professor 1 7%
Other 2 14%
Unknown 2 14%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 43%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 29%
Arts and Humanities 1 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 7%
Engineering 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 7%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2009.
All research outputs
#6,086,972
of 27,778,980 outputs
Outputs from Pancreatology
#300
of 1,349 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,612
of 148,405 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pancreatology
#4
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,778,980 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,349 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 148,405 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.