↓ Skip to main content

CRISPR–Cas systems: beyond adaptive immunity

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Reviews Microbiology, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
12 X users
patent
4 patents
wikipedia
7 Wikipedia pages
reddit
1 Redditor
video
1 YouTube creator

Readers on

mendeley
788 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
CRISPR–Cas systems: beyond adaptive immunity
Published in
Nature Reviews Microbiology, April 2014
DOI 10.1038/nrmicro3241
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The discovery of CRISPR-Cas (clustered, regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats-CRISPR-associated proteins) adaptive immune systems in prokaryotes has been one of the most exciting advances in microbiology in the past decade. Their role in host protection against mobile genetic elements is now well established, but there is mounting evidence that these systems modulate other processes, such as the genetic regulation of group behaviour and virulence, DNA repair and genome evolution. In this Progress article, we discuss recent studies that have provided insights into these unconventional CRISPR-Cas functions and consider their potential evolutionary implications. Understanding the role of CRISPR-Cas in these processes will improve our understanding of the evolution and maintenance of CRISPR-Cas systems in prokaryotic genomes.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 788 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 13 2%
Germany 4 <1%
Belgium 3 <1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Korea, Republic of 2 <1%
France 2 <1%
China 2 <1%
Chile 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Other 9 1%
Unknown 747 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 174 22%
Student > Bachelor 116 15%
Student > Master 109 14%
Researcher 108 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 26 3%
Other 102 13%
Unknown 153 19%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 294 37%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 192 24%
Immunology and Microbiology 47 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 28 4%
Chemistry 11 1%
Other 52 7%
Unknown 164 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 January 2026.
All research outputs
#2,281,200
of 34,444,361 outputs
Outputs from Nature Reviews Microbiology
#942
of 3,250 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,248
of 273,127 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Reviews Microbiology
#12
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,444,361 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,250 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 273,127 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.