↓ Skip to main content

Major Depressive Disorder in the 6 Months After Miscarriage

Overview of attention for article published in JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, February 1997
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user
reddit
1 Redditor
guideline
1 clinical guideline source

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Major Depressive Disorder in the 6 Months After Miscarriage
Published in
JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, February 1997
DOI 10.1001/jama.1997.03540290035029
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

To test a priori hypotheses that miscarrying women are at increased risk for a first or recurrent episode of major depressive disorder in the 6 months following loss and that this increased risk is greater for childless women, women with prior reproductive loss, and women aged 35 years or older; and to evaluate whether risk varies by time of gestation or by attitude toward the pregnancy.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 5%
Australia 1 5%
Unknown 18 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 4 20%
Other 2 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 10%
Student > Bachelor 2 10%
Lecturer 1 5%
Other 4 20%
Unknown 5 25%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 8 40%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 5%
Social Sciences 1 5%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 4 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 May 2025.
All research outputs
#2,528,764
of 34,454,098 outputs
Outputs from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#15,244
of 42,333 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,458
of 125,200 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#26
of 173 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,454,098 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 42,333 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 73.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 125,200 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 173 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.