↓ Skip to main content

Quantification of the Roles of Trabecular Microarchitecture and Trabecular Type in Determining the Elastic Modulus of Human Trabecular Bone

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Bone & Mineral Research, December 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Readers on

mendeley
122 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Quantification of the Roles of Trabecular Microarchitecture and Trabecular Type in Determining the Elastic Modulus of Human Trabecular Bone
Published in
Journal of Bone & Mineral Research, December 2009
DOI 10.1359/jbmr.060716
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The roles of microarchitecture and types of trabeculae in determining elastic modulus of trabecular bone have been studied in microCT images of 29 trabecular bone samples by comparing their Young's moduli calculated by finite element analysis (FEA) with different trabecular type-specific reconstructions. The results suggest that trabecular plates play an essential role in determining elastic properties of trabecular bone.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 122 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 115 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 24%
Student > Master 20 16%
Researcher 20 16%
Student > Bachelor 10 8%
Professor 8 7%
Other 17 14%
Unknown 18 15%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 47 39%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 7%
Materials Science 6 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 4%
Other 14 11%
Unknown 27 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 December 2015.
All research outputs
#10,734,780
of 34,447,360 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Bone & Mineral Research
#2,775
of 5,759 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,707
of 240,077 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Bone & Mineral Research
#878
of 1,712 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,447,360 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,759 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,077 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,712 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.