↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Readers on

mendeley
556 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
What Is the Value of the Routine Use of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Toward Improvement of Patient Outcomes, Processes of Care, and Health Service Outcomes in Cancer Care? A Systematic Review of Controlled Trials
Published in
Journal of Clinical Oncology, April 2014
DOI 10.1200/jco.2013.53.5948
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 556 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Philippines 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 548 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 78 14%
Student > Master 63 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 58 10%
Other 36 6%
Student > Bachelor 29 5%
Other 112 20%
Unknown 180 32%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 172 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 66 12%
Psychology 20 4%
Social Sciences 16 3%
Computer Science 11 2%
Other 61 11%
Unknown 210 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 47. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 February 2025.
All research outputs
#1,120,935
of 33,779,198 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Oncology
#2,941
of 31,079 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,064
of 269,721 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Oncology
#30
of 446 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,779,198 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,079 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,721 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 446 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.