↓ Skip to main content

NIPT: current utilization and implications for the future of prenatal genetic counseling

Overview of attention for article published in Prenatal Diagnosis, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
94 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
NIPT: current utilization and implications for the future of prenatal genetic counseling
Published in
Prenatal Diagnosis, April 2014
DOI 10.1002/pd.4382
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for select fetal trisomies became clinically available in 2011. When it was introduced, there were no recommendations from the major governing bodies in prenatal genetics regarding its incorporation.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 4 4%
Korea, Republic of 1 1%
China 1 1%
Unknown 88 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 19%
Other 15 16%
Student > Master 12 13%
Student > Bachelor 10 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 11%
Other 15 16%
Unknown 14 15%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 31%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 12%
Social Sciences 8 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 6%
Other 4 4%
Unknown 18 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 September 2014.
All research outputs
#16,048,009
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Prenatal Diagnosis
#1,609
of 2,385 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#131,341
of 241,070 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Prenatal Diagnosis
#12
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,385 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,070 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.