↓ Skip to main content

Circadian Clocks and Inflammation: Reciprocal Regulation and Shared Mediators

Overview of attention for article published in Archivum Immunologiae et Therapiae Experimentalis, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
12 X users

Readers on

mendeley
170 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Circadian Clocks and Inflammation: Reciprocal Regulation and Shared Mediators
Published in
Archivum Immunologiae et Therapiae Experimentalis, April 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00005-014-0286-x
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The immune system is deeply interconnected with the endogenous 24-h oscillators of the circadian system. Indeed, the connection between these two physiological systems occurs at multiple levels and in both directions. On one hand, various aspects of the immune system show daily rhythms, which appear to be essential for healthy immune maintenance and proper immune response. On the other hand, immune responses cause changes in circadian rhythms, disrupting their delicate balance and manifesting in disease. Indeed, immune challenges cause various time-, gene-, and tissue-specific effects on circadian-regulated factors. This article reviews the possible mediators of the cross talk between the circadian clock and the immune system, in particular the inflammatory pathways. The rhythmic expression of cytokines and their receptors, as well as other rhythmically regulated humoral factors such as glucocorticoids, melatonin, leptin, or prostaglandins, could gate the effects of the immune response on the circadian system. In addition, systemic cues such as body temperature and neuronal connections between the brain and peripheral tissues may underlie the immune-circadian communication.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 170 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 165 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 20%
Researcher 25 15%
Student > Master 24 14%
Student > Bachelor 16 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 10 6%
Other 23 14%
Unknown 38 22%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 37 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 24 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 20 12%
Neuroscience 17 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 9 5%
Other 16 9%
Unknown 47 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2023.
All research outputs
#5,466,606
of 26,237,895 outputs
Outputs from Archivum Immunologiae et Therapiae Experimentalis
#65
of 398 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,282
of 240,084 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archivum Immunologiae et Therapiae Experimentalis
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,237,895 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 398 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,084 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them