↓ Skip to main content

Outcomes of extremely low birthweight infants with acidosis at birth

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Disease in Childhood -- Fetal & Neonatal Edition, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Outcomes of extremely low birthweight infants with acidosis at birth
Published in
Archives of Disease in Childhood -- Fetal & Neonatal Edition, February 2014
DOI 10.1136/archdischild-2013-304179
Pubmed ID
Authors

David A. Randolph, Tracy L. Nolen, Namasivayam Ambalavanan, Waldemar A. Carlo, Myriam Peralta-Carcelen, Abhik Das, Edward F. Bell, Alexis S. Davis, R. Laptook, Barbara J. Stoll, Seetha Shankaran, Rosemary D. Higgins, on behalf of the Generic Database and Follow-Up Subcommittees for the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network

Abstract

To test the hypothesis that acidosis at birth is associated with the combined primary outcome of death or neurodevelopmental impairment (NDI) in extremely low birthweight (ELBW) infants, and to develop a predictive model of death/NDI exploring perinatal acidosis as a predictor variable.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Austria 1 2%
Unknown 62 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 19%
Other 7 11%
Student > Master 7 11%
Student > Bachelor 6 9%
Lecturer 5 8%
Other 14 22%
Unknown 13 20%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 39%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Psychology 3 5%
Sports and Recreations 2 3%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 20 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 April 2014.
All research outputs
#24,782,047
of 34,400,738 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Disease in Childhood -- Fetal & Neonatal Edition
#2,241
of 2,708 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#185,932
of 269,834 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Disease in Childhood -- Fetal & Neonatal Edition
#16
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,400,738 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,708 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,834 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.