↓ Skip to main content

Two Alternating Motor Programs Drive Navigation in Drosophila Larva

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, August 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
140 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Two Alternating Motor Programs Drive Navigation in Drosophila Larva
Published in
PLOS ONE, August 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0023180
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

When placed on a temperature gradient, a Drosophila larva navigates away from excessive cold or heat by regulating the size, frequency, and direction of reorientation maneuvers between successive periods of forward movement. Forward movement is driven by peristalsis waves that travel from tail to head. During each reorientation maneuver, the larva pauses and sweeps its head from side to side until it picks a new direction for forward movement. Here, we characterized the motor programs that underlie the initiation, execution, and completion of reorientation maneuvers by measuring body segment dynamics of freely moving larvae with fluorescent muscle fibers as they were exposed to temporal changes in temperature. We find that reorientation maneuvers are characterized by highly stereotyped spatiotemporal patterns of segment dynamics. Reorientation maneuvers are initiated with head sweeping movement driven by asymmetric contraction of a portion of anterior body segments. The larva attains a new direction for forward movement after head sweeping movement by using peristalsis waves that gradually push posterior body segments out of alignment with the tail (i.e., the previous direction of forward movement) into alignment with the head. Thus, reorientation maneuvers during thermotaxis are carried out by two alternating motor programs: (1) peristalsis for driving forward movement and (2) asymmetric contraction of anterior body segments for driving head sweeping movement.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 140 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
China 2 1%
United States 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 134 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 26%
Student > Master 21 15%
Researcher 19 14%
Student > Bachelor 15 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 6%
Other 16 11%
Unknown 23 16%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 49 35%
Neuroscience 29 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 9%
Physics and Astronomy 8 6%
Computer Science 7 5%
Other 9 6%
Unknown 26 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 August 2011.
All research outputs
#24,753,774
of 34,360,889 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#157,358
of 224,517 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#133,279
of 168,399 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#2,002
of 2,671 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,360,889 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 224,517 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.2. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,399 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,671 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.