You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Habitat structure and body size distributions: cross‐ecosystem comparison for taxa with determinate and indeterminate growth
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Oikos, April 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1111/oik.01314 |
| Authors |
Kirsty L. Nash, Craig R. Allen, Chris Barichievy, Magnus Nyström, Shana Sundstrom, Nicholas A. J. Graham |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Australia | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| South Africa | 1 | 1% |
| Japan | 1 | 1% |
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 85 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 24 | 26% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 11% |
| Professor | 6 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 17 | 18% |
| Unknown | 10 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 39 | 42% |
| Environmental Science | 31 | 34% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 4 | 4% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 2% |
| Linguistics | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 14 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 February 2015.
All research outputs
#4,178,054
of 24,549,201 outputs
Outputs from Oikos
#900
of 3,177 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,796
of 233,122 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oikos
#19
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,549,201 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,177 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 233,122 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.