↓ Skip to main content

Trastuzumab-Based Combinations in Metastatic Breast Cancer: How to Make a Choice

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Breast Cancer, April 2003
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
6 patents

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Trastuzumab-Based Combinations in Metastatic Breast Cancer: How to Make a Choice
Published in
Clinical Breast Cancer, April 2003
DOI 10.3816/cbc.2003.n.009
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Trastuzumab, a humanized monoclonal anti-human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2) antibody that has proven efficacy as monotherapy in HER2-overexpressing breast cancer, has a favorable toxicity profile characterized by infrequent infusion reactions and a slightly increased incidence of cardiac dysfunction. Regimens that combine trastuzumab with a cytotoxic agent can increase the overall response rate and prolong survival in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Trastuzumab has been investigated in combination with anthracyclines, taxanes, platinum salts, vinorelbine, gemcitabine, capecitabine, and combinations of these agents. Combining trastuzumab with these agents enhances the toxicity of treatment and can especially enhance the risk of cardiotoxicity. This article summarizes data on trastuzumab-based combinations with particular attention to the risk benefit ratio of these therapies. HER2 testing by immunohistochemistry or fluorescence in situ hybridization is discussed in the context of determining the optimal course of treatment for patients.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 4%
Unknown 24 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 16%
Researcher 4 16%
Student > Bachelor 3 12%
Student > Postgraduate 3 12%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 4%
Other 4 16%
Unknown 6 24%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 36%
Psychology 5 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 8%
Unknown 7 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 September 2020.
All research outputs
#9,515,649
of 27,778,980 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Breast Cancer
#355
of 1,175 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,579
of 70,518 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Breast Cancer
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,778,980 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,175 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 70,518 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them