↓ Skip to main content

The Formin DAD Domain Plays Dual Roles in Autoinhibition and Actin Nucleation

Overview of attention for article published in Current Biology, February 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

f1000
1 research highlight platform

Readers on

mendeley
97 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The Formin DAD Domain Plays Dual Roles in Autoinhibition and Actin Nucleation
Published in
Current Biology, February 2011
DOI 10.1016/j.cub.2011.01.047
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Formins are a large family of actin assembly-promoting proteins with many important biological roles. However, it has remained unclear how formins nucleate actin polymerization. All other nucleators are known to recruit actin monomers as a central part of their mechanisms. However, the actin-nucleating FH2 domain of formins lacks appreciable affinity for monomeric actin. Here, we found that yeast and mammalian formins bind actin monomers but that this activity requires their C-terminal DAD domains. Furthermore, we observed that the DAD works in concert with the FH2 to enhance nucleation without affecting the rate of filament elongation. We dissected this mechanism in mDia1, mapped nucleation activity to conserved residues in the DAD, and demonstrated that DAD roles in nucleation and autoinhibition are separable. Furthermore, DAD enhancement of nucleation was independent of contributions from the FH1 domain to nucleation. Together, our data show that (1) the DAD has dual functions in autoinhibition and nucleation; (2) the FH1, FH2, and DAD form a tripartite nucleation machine; and (3) formins nucleate by recruiting actin monomers and therefore are more similar to other nucleators than previously thought.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Germany 2 2%
United States 1 1%
Japan 1 1%
France 1 1%
Unknown 92 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 30%
Researcher 14 14%
Student > Bachelor 9 9%
Student > Master 6 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 5%
Other 11 11%
Unknown 23 24%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 39 40%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 26 27%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 3%
Chemistry 3 3%
Engineering 2 2%
Other 1 1%
Unknown 23 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 August 2011.
All research outputs
#17,700,438
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Current Biology
#12,663
of 14,826 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#96,414
of 121,067 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Biology
#65
of 89 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,826 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 62.2. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 121,067 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 89 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.