↓ Skip to main content

Transfusion history and cancer risk in older women.

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Internal Medicine, July 1993
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

guideline
1 clinical guideline source

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Transfusion history and cancer risk in older women.
Published in
Annals of Internal Medicine, July 1993
DOI 10.7326/0003-4819-119-1-199307010-00002
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

To test the hypothesis that history of blood transfusion is associated with an increased incidence of cancer in older women. Prospective cohort study. General community in the state of Iowa. Random sample of 37,337 cancer-free Iowa women ages 55 to 69 years. Transfusion history was assessed with a mailed questionnaire completed in January 1986. Cancer incidence in 5 years was ascertained by a population-based cancer registry. Women who had ever received a blood transfusion were at an increased risk for non-Hodgkin lymphoma (relative risk (RR) = 2.20; 95% CI, 1.35 to 3.58) and kidney cancer (RR = 2.53; CI, 1.34 to 4.78). The relative risks for these cancers were greater with decreasing time from first transfusion. No increased risk occurred for cancers of the breast, lung, uterine corpus, ovary, pancreas, colon, rectum, skin (melanoma), or for all cancers considered together. These findings suggest that previous blood transfusion may be a risk factor for non-Hodgkin lymphoma and kidney cancer but is not associated with the most common neoplasms.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 23%
Student > Bachelor 4 15%
Professor 3 12%
Researcher 3 12%
Student > Master 2 8%
Other 3 12%
Unknown 5 19%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 42%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 8%
Sports and Recreations 2 8%
Social Sciences 2 8%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 4%
Other 3 12%
Unknown 5 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 July 2014.
All research outputs
#12,428,062
of 34,526,284 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Internal Medicine
#11,295
of 16,974 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,445
of 28,982 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Internal Medicine
#43
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,526,284 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,974 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 59.1. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 28,982 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.