↓ Skip to main content

The Journal of Rheumatology

Validating the SF-36 health survey questionnaire in patients with psoriatic arthritis.

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Rheumatology, March 1997
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Citations

dimensions_citation
159 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
Title
Validating the SF-36 health survey questionnaire in patients with psoriatic arthritis.
Published in
Journal of Rheumatology, March 1997
Pubmed ID
Authors

J A Husted, D D Gladman, V T Farewell, J A Long, R J Cook

Abstract

To assess the reliability and validity of the SF-36 in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA). The SF-36 was administered to all patients attending the University of Toronto Psoriatic Arthritis Clinic between January and December 1994. Clinical and radiological assessments were performed during the clinic visits. We studied 113 patients, 43 women and 70 men, with a mean age of 50.5 years and a mean arthritis duration of 14.2 years. The reliability of the SF-36 was high, with the Cronbach alpha coefficient exceeding 0.90 for all the 8 health scales. The SF-36 was able to detect meaningful differences in health status between patients with PsA and individuals from the general population. As predicted, patients with PsA reported substantially lower scores on the physical functioning, role limitations due to physical problems, and pain scales. They also reported significantly lower scores on the role limitations due to emotional problems and general health perception scale. In general all scales were moderately to highly correlated with measures of function and pain (r = 0.33-0.67), while the physical functioning, pain, and vitality scales were also moderately correlated with disease activity (r = 0.34-0.42). With one exception the scales were unrelated to disease severity. The SF-36 questionnaire is reliable and valid for use in PsA, supporting its use as an adjunct outcome measure for clinical trials in PsA. Because the SF-36 can be used to compare health status across different patient populations, its application can also help to clarify the disease burden associated with PsA.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 44 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 27%
Student > Master 9 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 11%
Other 5 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 9%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 4 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 62%
Psychology 3 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Social Sciences 2 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 2%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 4 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 July 2022.
All research outputs
#4,837,286
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Rheumatology
#988
of 3,951 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,871
of 29,048 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Rheumatology
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,951 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 29,048 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.