You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Attention over time
Attention Score history
Activity
X Demographics
Mendeley demographics
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Respiratory Outcomes of the Surfactant Positive Pressure and Oximetry Randomized Trial (SUPPORT)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Pediatrics, April 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jpeds.2014.02.054 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Timothy P. Stevens, Neil N. Finer, Waldemar A. Carlo, Peter G. Szilagyi, Dale L. Phelps, Michele C. Walsh, Marie G. Gantz, R. Laptook, Bradley A. Yoder, Roger G. Faix, Jamie E. Newman, Abhik Das, Barbara T., Kurt Schibler, Wade Rich, Nancy S. Newman, Richard A. Ehrenkranz, Myriam Peralta-Carcelen, Betty R. Vohr, Deanne E. Wilson-Costello, Kimberly Yolton, Roy J. Heyne, Patricia W. Evans, Yvonne E. Vaucher, Ira Adams-Chapman, Elisabeth C. McGowan, Anna Bodnar, Athina Pappas, Susan R. Hintz, Michael J. Acarregui, Janell Fuller, Ricki F. Goldstein, Charles R. Bauer, T. Michael O’Shea, Gary J. Myers, Rosemary D. Higgins, SUPPORT Study Group of the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network |
Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 1 | 20% |
| Spain | 1 | 20% |
| Central African Republic | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 60% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 40% |
Mendeley demographics
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 178 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | 1% |
| Philippines | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 175 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 22 | 12% |
| Researcher | 19 | 11% |
| Other | 15 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 13 | 7% |
| Other | 47 | 26% |
| Unknown | 49 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 89 | 50% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 2% |
| Unknown | 61 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 May 2024.
All research outputs
#2,922,820
of 34,559,526 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pediatrics
#1,745
of 15,779 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,723
of 272,369 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pediatrics
#18
of 125 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,559,526 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,779 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 272,369 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 125 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.