↓ Skip to main content

Use of 99mTc-doxorubicin scintigraphy in females with breast cancer: a pilot study

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of Radiology, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Use of 99mTc-doxorubicin scintigraphy in females with breast cancer: a pilot study
Published in
British Journal of Radiology, May 2015
DOI 10.1259/bjr.20150268
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Doxorubicin (Eurofarma, São Paulo, Brazil) is an antitumour agent widely used in the treatment of breast cancer and can be used for tumour tracking when labelled with a radionuclide. Here, we present the results obtained with technetium-99m ((99m)Tc)-doxorubicin, using the direct method, to evaluate its uptake in breast cancer. Four females with confirmed breast carcinoma diagnosis and breast image reporting and data system Category 5 on mammography underwent whole-body and thorax single-photon emission CT/CT imaging 1 and 3 h after (99m)Tc-doxorubicin administration. We observed increased uptake in breast carcinoma lesions and elimination via renal and hepatic pathways. These preliminary results suggest that (99m)Tc-doxorubicin may be a promising radiopharmaceutical for the evaluation of patients with breast cancer. Further studies are ongoing. Advances in knowledge: To our knowledge, this is the first study to evaluate the use of a directly labelled doxorubicin tracer in humans. (99m)Tc-doxorubicin could provide information on the response of tumours to doxorubicin.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 19%
Student > Bachelor 2 13%
Student > Master 2 13%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 6%
Lecturer 1 6%
Other 4 25%
Unknown 3 19%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 19%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 6%
Psychology 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2019.
All research outputs
#12,345,312
of 34,365,356 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Radiology
#1,550
of 4,486 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#117,256
of 306,807 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Radiology
#17
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,365,356 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,486 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 306,807 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.