↓ Skip to main content

Evaluating the clinical appropriateness of nurses’ prescribing practice: method development and findings from an expert panel analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Quality & Safety in Health Care, November 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Evaluating the clinical appropriateness of nurses’ prescribing practice: method development and findings from an expert panel analysis
Published in
Quality & Safety in Health Care, November 2007
DOI 10.1136/qshc.2005.017038
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The number of nurses independently prescribing medicines in England is rising steadily. There had been no attempt systematically to evaluate the clinical appropriateness of nurses' prescribing decisions.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 5 8%
Germany 1 2%
Unknown 54 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 23%
Student > Master 7 12%
Researcher 7 12%
Student > Bachelor 5 8%
Student > Postgraduate 4 7%
Other 8 13%
Unknown 15 25%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 17%
Social Sciences 6 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 7%
Psychology 2 3%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 18 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2017.
All research outputs
#2,332,630
of 34,410,798 outputs
Outputs from Quality & Safety in Health Care
#79
of 729 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,875
of 226,161 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Quality & Safety in Health Care
#3
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,410,798 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 729 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,161 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.