↓ Skip to main content

Negative frequency-dependent preferences and variation in male facial hair

Overview of attention for article published in Biology Letters, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Readers on

mendeley
160 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Negative frequency-dependent preferences and variation in male facial hair
Published in
Biology Letters, April 2014
DOI 10.1098/rsbl.2013.0958
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Negative frequency-dependent sexual selection maintains striking polymorphisms in secondary sexual traits in several animal species. Here, we test whether frequency of beardedness modulates perceived attractiveness of men's facial hair, a secondary sexual trait subject to considerable cultural variation. We first showed participants a suite of faces, within which we manipulated the frequency of beard thicknesses and then measured preferences for four standard levels of beardedness. Women and men judged heavy stubble and full beards more attractive when presented in treatments where beards were rare than when they were common, with intermediate preferences when intermediate frequencies of beardedness were presented. Likewise, clean-shaven faces were least attractive when clean-shaven faces were most common and more attractive when rare. This pattern in preferences is consistent with negative frequency-dependent selection.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 148 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 160 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 3%
Switzerland 2 1%
United States 1 <1%
Serbia 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Panama 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Hungary 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Other 3 2%
Unknown 144 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 31 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 19%
Student > Bachelor 23 14%
Researcher 20 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 12 8%
Other 24 15%
Unknown 20 13%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 71 44%
Psychology 31 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 5%
Social Sciences 5 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 3%
Other 19 12%
Unknown 21 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 714. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2026.
All research outputs
#36,165
of 34,545,128 outputs
Outputs from Biology Letters
#55
of 3,967 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#185
of 270,633 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biology Letters
#1
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,545,128 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,967 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 61.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 270,633 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.